Posts Tagged ‘f’
Cool f 5 Sigma 800mm
Twilight is a young adult fiction novel written by Stephanie Meyer. It stars Bella Swan, and her love interest (a vampire) Edward Cullen.
The story begins as with Bella saying a tearful goodbye to her mother, as she begins her journey to the town of Forks to stay with her father. Expecting a thoroughly mundane experience, Bella is surprised to notice a table full of spectacularly good looking teenagers. One of which, is Edward Cullen. Although his initial response to her is less than promising, he slowly warms up to he and eventually falls in love. All of this is happening while he trying desperately not to eat her.
My first qualm with the book is simple. I know nothing about either Bella’s appearance. I think she may have brown hair, and also she is pale. Both of these things are mentioned in the first chapter of the book, and that is the extent of Bella’s appearance. On the other hand, I know a lot about Edward’s appearance. She also goes into great detail describing how he moves, breaths, and kisses.
Perhaps because I know little about her appearance, I shouldn’t be surprised to learn that her personality is never divulged either. The only character traits Bella seems to exhibit with any regularity is shyness, and klutziness. Although Meyer goes to great lengths to explain just how klutzy Bella is, she never relates it to anything outside the scene that is happening. It seems that if a person is that klutzy, after screwing something up they might have flash backs to the last time they screwed something up. Bella seems to only have two emotions throughout the books, one is embarrassed about her klutziness, and the other is completely in love with Edward.
Although the concept of true love conquering all isn’t new, Meyer certainly manages to give it a new twist. Not to say that is a good thing. All in all, this book left me with more questions than answers. The most startling of all being “Who is Bella?”
Sigma 800mm f 5
Is Phoenix 8 500mm f suck?
The best Buy in town. I had purchased a considerably more expensive upright based on Consumer Reports review that was so hard to push that even my husband (big guy) had trouble with it. I gave that one away in the first two or three months. We both use this one, very easy to push, good suction and I don’t find it too loud.
Phoenix 500mm f 8
Nikon 105mm 18 f for good
Overall, I would have to say this lens does what it is supposed to do. It is an excellent general purpose zoom, with the added benefit of VR. Just to make things clear, I am not the type of person who compares the minute details of lenses; but I do notice the differences between them. After using this lens and selling it to purchase the nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, I have noticed a few differences between them. Obviously, build quality is no competition, with the 17-55 easily winning (feels like one solid machined block!) There is one thing that I definitely miss from the 18-105mm though–VR! Yes, over the course of time that I had the 17-55mm, I learned to love VR, and trust me–you don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone, especially in the case of VR. VR aside, however, the 17-55 has the benefit of a constant aperture, along with better contrast and color in my opinion. then again, it costs three times what the 18-105 does (I bought mine off of craigslist for $900–don’t pay $1220 new, that is a ripoff. if you’re going to pay that much get the new 24-70mm.) For what it is supposed to do, however, the 18-105mm does just fine.
Nikon 18 105mm f